Quantum Computing and Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Analysis of Growth, Governance, and Policy Challenges
- Rehman Shaikh
- Aug 12
- 11 min read
If you are interested in applying to GGI's Impact Fellowship program, you can access our application link here.
Executive Summary
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Quantum Computing (QC) represent two of the most rapidly evolving and transformative technological forces shaping the 21st century. While AI has already matured and been widely deployed across industries, QC remains in its early stages yet promises exponential computational advantages. This white paper presents a comparative and data-driven analysis of the growth, industrial readiness, governance frameworks, security implications, and policy gaps associated with both technologies. The goal is to provide a strategic roadmap for stakeholders—governments, industry leaders, and civil society—on how to harness these technologies responsibly and equitably.
1.Growth Trajectories – Strategic Implications and Global Momentum
1.1 Artificial Intelligence (AI): Market Penetration and Societal Disruption
Artificial Intelligence has moved beyond experimental adoption to become a defining force in the global economy, labor markets, and geopolitical competition. As of 2023, the global AI market stood at $150 billion, projected to reach $1.6 trillion by 2030 (Statista, McKinsey). Over 10 million professionals work in AI-related roles globally, reflecting its high level of industrial maturity and integration across sectors from finance to defense.
The most consequential implications of AI include:
Labor Market Transformation: Up to 375 million workers may need to switch occupational categories by 2030 (McKinsey Global Institute).
Geopolitical AI Race: Nations like the U.S. and China are investing heavily, with the U.S. National AI Initiative and China's Next Generation AI Development Plan both exceeding $10 billion in funding.
Public Trust and Ethics Crisis: AI-generated misinformation, deepfakes, and algorithmic bias continue to undermine democratic processes and consumer confidence.
1.2 Quantum Computing (QC): Strategic Potential Amid Technical Immaturity
Quantum computing remains pre-commercial, but its strategic significance far exceeds current deployment levels. With a 2023 market size of $35 billion and projected growth to $93 billion by 2030, QC is commanding attention from both governments and multinationals—despite having fewer than 50,000 skilled professionals globally.
Current implications include:
Cybersecurity Paradigm Shift: QC could render widely used encryption protocols (RSA, ECC) obsolete. A 2023 report by the Global Risk Institute estimates 50% of global encrypted data could become vulnerable within a decade.
Scientific Leapfrogging: Companies like Google (Sycamore) and IBM (Qiskit) are progressing towards useful quantum advantage, with applications in drug discovery, optimization, and simulation.
Strategic Rivalries: National quantum programs now exceed $30 billion globally, positioning QC as a future determinant of geopolitical leverage—similar to nuclear or space technologies in past eras.
1.3 Comparative table: Global Positioning and Readiness
Metric | Artificial Intelligence | Quantum computing |
2023 Market Value | $150 billion | $35 billion |
2030 Projected Value | $1.6 trillion | $93 billion |
Global Workforce | >10 million | ~ 50,000 |
Technology readiness level | 8-9 (commercial ready) | 3-5 (Experimental) |
Deployment Status | Ubiquitous | Limited to research & pilots |
Strategic risk/Opportunity | Labor, ethics, trust | cryptography, global equity, militarization |
Both technologies are reshaping the foundations of computation—AI through data-driven adaptation and QC through a fundamental redefinition of computing architecture. Their convergence could amplify impacts, particularly in optimization, cryptography, and machine learning.
2. Applications and Industry Impact: Sectoral Disruption and Cross-Technology Potential
AI and QC are already altering the strategic calculus across sectors—from drug development to supply chain resilience. While AI dominates current deployments, QC's promise lies in solving optimization and simulation problems that are computationally intractable for classical systems.
2.1 Healthcare
AI: As of 2023, over 500 AI medical devices have been approved by the FDA. Use cases include cancer diagnostics, real-time patient triage, and digital therapeutics. AI-driven solutions like Google’s DeepMind have achieved >90% accuracy in breast cancer screening.
QC: By modeling quantum states of molecules, QC enables rapid screening of drug candidates—potentially reducing development time by 70%. Partnerships like Roche + QC Ware and Bohringer Ingelheim + Google indicate strong pharma interest.
2.2 Finance
AI: AI powers over 60% of equity trading in developed markets (Deloitte). ML is integral to credit scoring (FICO, Zest AI) and fraud analytics—processing millions of transactions in real time.
QC: Simulations from firms like Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan show QC can reduce portfolio optimization times by orders of magnitude, especially in high-dimensional risk modeling. QC is also being tested for quantum-secure blockchain protocols.
2.3 Logistics and Manufacturing
AI: AI enables 10–20% cost reductions in smart factories via predictive maintenance, autonomous inspection, and demand forecasting (BCG). Amazon uses AI to automate more than 75% of its warehouse operations.
QC: Quantum-inspired algorithms are already reducing routing inefficiencies. Volkswagen’s pilot in Beijing taxi routing showed a 20% reduction in travel time using quantum annealing. Long-term potential includes real-time optimization of global supply networks.
2.4 Climate and Energy
AI: Google DeepMind's AI improved wind farm energy forecasting accuracy by 20%, directly increasing grid stability. AI is critical for carbon emissions modeling and climate risk assessment.
QC: Simulating quantum systems could unlock breakthroughs in green materials (e.g., catalysts, solar cells). The U.S. Department of Energy estimates QC could accelerate fusion energy research by 5–10 years.
2.5 Cybersecurity
AI: Used in 90% of enterprise SOCs (Security Operations Centers) for threat detection (IBM, Palo Alto Networks). But adversarial AI, model spoofing, and synthetic identity fraud pose new risks.
QC: Shor’s algorithm threatens to break 2048-bit RSA in polynomial time once scalable qubit systems emerge. As a counter, Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) and Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) are under rapid development, with NIST standardization underway (expected 2024–25).
The distinct capabilities of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Quantum Computing (QC) offer both standalone benefits and synergistic potential across a range of industries. While AI excels in data-driven decision-making, automation, and pattern recognition, QC brings a fundamentally new way of solving complex, multidimensional problems at an unprecedented speed.
3. Governance Challenges
3.1 Artificial Intelligence
AI's explosive growth has far outpaced regulatory efforts. Key governance challenges include:
●Regulatory Lag: Frameworks such as the EU AI Act and OECD AI Principles are still being defined or inconsistently adopted.
●Algorithmic Bias: AI systems can inherit and reinforce societal biases, leading to discrimination in hiring, policing, and lending.
●Job Displacement: Automation threatens jobs in manufacturing, customer service, transportation, and beyond.
●Misinformation & Deepfakes: AI-generated content blurs the line between truth and fiction, with implications for elections, media, and public trust.
3.2 Quantum Computing
QC presents a distinct set of challenges—ones that are mostly theoretical but imminent:
●Cybersecurity Disruption: Quantum algorithms (e.g., Shor’s Algorithm) could break modern encryption standards (RSA, ECC), putting global communication at risk.
● Technological Inequality: Nations or corporations that achieve quantum advantage first may dominate critical infrastructure and global influence.
●Military Applications: Quantum sensing and communication tools could radically enhance intelligence and defense capabilities, potentially leading to an arms race.
●Intellectual Property (IP): The unique nature of quantum algorithms requires a reevaluation of current IP laws.
4. Global Policy Landscape
4.1 National Quantum Initiatives
As nations begin to understand the strategic implications of quantum technology, many have launched dedicated national programs to ensure competitiveness and security in the emerging quantum era. Below is an overview of the leading global quantum computing initiatives:
United States: The U.S. has enacted the National Quantum Initiative Act and the Quantum Computing Cybersecurity Preparedness Act to lead in quantum technology. Agencies like NIST, DARPA, and companies such as IBM and Google are at the forefront of quantum research and development.
China: With over $10 billion in investment, China has launched the National Laboratory for Quantum Information Sciences and the Micius satellite—the world’s first quantum satellite for secure communication. China is also advancing quantum-resistant encryption technologies.
European Union: The Quantum Technologies Flagship Program, a €1 billion initiative, is designed to integrate quantum computing into industry, with heavy investments by countries like Germany, France, and the Netherlands in academic and startup ecosystems.
United Kingdom: The UK’s National Quantum Technologies Programme, backed by over £1 billion, supports research and commercialization in quantum computing, sensing, and secure communications.
India: India launched its National Quantum Mission in 2023 with a $730 million budget focused on quantum communication, computing, and cryptography. The mission emphasizes building indigenous capabilities and infrastructure.
Canada: Canada’s National Quantum Strategy supports research commercialization and skills development. Institutions like the University of Waterloo’s Perimeter Institute and D-Wave Systems are global leaders in quantum innovation.
Australia: Through the Sydney Quantum Academy and funding from the Australian Research Council, Australia is investing in research focused on superconducting quantum computing and quantum education.
Japan: Japan’s Quantum Leap Flagship Program supports the development of quantum infrastructure and collaborative research for practical, industry-driven quantum applications.
Russia: Led by Rosatom, Russia is developing a universal quantum computer with public cloud access, aiming to become a dominant force in quantum technology by 2024.
South Korea & Singapore: Both nations are heavily investing in quantum R&D. Singapore’s Quantum Engineering Program and South Korea’s Quantum Computing Technology Development Project (launched in 2019) support domestic innovation and regional leadership.
4.1.1 Major Policy Milestones:
4.2 Lack of Global Coordination
While AI has seen early steps toward international policy alignment—such as the OECD AI Principles, UNESCO AI Ethics Framework, and the Global Partnership on AI—quantum computing (QC) still lacks any comparable global governance mechanism. This policy vacuum raises several pressing concerns:
a. Risk of Technological Monopolization
QC development is currently concentrated in a handful of nations and corporations due to its high costs and complexity. Without international cooperation, this could lead to monopolies that control access to quantum infrastructure, increasing global inequality and limiting participation from developing nations.
b. Security and Ethical Gaps
QC’s potential to break classical encryption presents global cybersecurity risks. Without shared norms or standards for post-quantum cryptography and ethical research practices, nations are left to act independently, potentially creating incompatible systems or unethical applications.
c. Geopolitical Tensions
Quantum technologies are increasingly viewed through a strategic, military lens. In the absence of transparency and cooperation, nations may pursue competitive and potentially destabilizing uses of quantum tech—mirroring past arms races.
d. Fragmentation and Missed Opportunities
A lack of common standards can lead to fragmented quantum ecosystems, slowing global innovation. Moreover, QC’s vast problem-solving potential—for climate modeling, drug discovery, and energy optimization—may go underutilized without collaborative frameworks.
5. Ethical, Social, and Strategic Considerations
As Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Quantum Computing (QC) continue to evolve, they bring not only technological advantages but also profound ethical, societal, and geopolitical implications. These challenges demand critical attention from policymakers, technologists, and civil society to ensure these technologies are developed and deployed in a manner that promotes equity, accountability, and public good.
5.1 Surveillance and Privacy
AI has already enabled mass surveillance systems capable of tracking individual behavior, facial recognition, and real-time data collection. These capabilities often operate in legal grey areas, raising serious concerns about civil liberties and the right to privacy. The introduction of QC amplifies these risks—particularly through its ability to break traditional encryption methods. If in the wrong hands, QC could compromise secure communications, personal data, and national intelligence networks, eroding public trust and violating fundamental rights to privacy and autonomy.
5.2 Access and Equity
The development of AI and QC is currently dominated by technologically advanced nations and powerful corporations, creating an imbalance in access to these transformative tools. Most developing countries lack the resources, infrastructure, or expertise to participate meaningfully in this technological evolution. This disparity could widen the global digital divide, exacerbating economic inequalities and leaving less-developed nations vulnerable to technological dependence or manipulation, unless addressed through capacity building and inclusive international cooperation.
Furthermore, within countries, unequal access to AI systems (such as in healthcare or education) could reinforce existing social disparities unless inclusive policies are put in place to democratize access.
5.3 Environmental Impact AI training models, particularly large-scale neural networks, demand vast computational resources and energy, contributing significantly to carbon emissions. Similarly, quantum computers, especially those relying on superconducting qubits—require ultra-low temperatures and extensive cooling infrastructure, consuming large amounts of energy. Without investments in energy-efficient algorithms and sustainable hardware, the widespread adoption of these technologies may accelerate environmental degradation and conflict with global climate goals. 5.4 Misuse and Exploitation
AI is already being weaponized in areas such as misinformation, deepfakes, autonomous weaponry, and algorithmic manipulation of public opinion. QC, if not carefully governed, could also be exploited by enabling decryption of secure data, designing advanced biological agents, or accelerating cyber warfare capabilities. The potential for dual-use applications in both fields means that without stringent oversight, these technologies could be used for harm as easily as for good. Ethical lapses, lack of accountability, and absence of global norms increase the risk of their misuse for political, economic, or military advantage.
6. Policy Recommendations
To address these multidimensional challenges, the following strategies are essential: 6.1 Integrated Regulatory Frameworks Governments must stop treating AI and QC as isolated domains and instead develop cohesive, cross-technology regulations that address: ● Data use and privacy
● Algorithmic accountability
● Cryptographic standards 6.2 Post-Quantum Cryptography Transition
Immediate R&D and deployment of quantum-resistant encryption should be prioritized to secure financial, governmental, and defense communication systems.
6.3 Education and Workforce Development
● Integrate quantum and AI subjects into school and university curricula.
● Launch upskilling and reskilling programs to prepare workers for future jobs.
6.4 Establish a Global Quantum Governance Council
An international consortium, like the International Atomic Energy Agency, should:
● Monitor quantum R&D
● Set ethical standards
● Ensure equitable access
● Prevent militarization
6.5 Public Engagement and Awareness
Citizens must be made aware of both the benefits and risks through:
● Transparent reporting
● Civic tech forums
● Digital literacy programs
Conclusion
Artificial Intelligence has already redefined modern life, and Quantum Computing promises to unlock the next frontier of human capability. However, the global community has already witnessed the consequences of lagging behind on AI policy—issues of surveillance, bias, and misinformation remain unresolved. With QC on the horizon, it is imperative that policymakers act now to prevent history from repeating itself.
Without strategic foresight, nations risk falling into a technological divide that could destabilize economies, threaten privacy, and even redefine power structures. The path forward must be collaborative, inclusive, and deeply rooted in ethics—ensuring that AI and QC serve as tools for equitable progress rather than unregulated disruption.
Meet The Thought Leader
Karan Patel is a mentor at GGI an undergraduate from IIT Madras. He is currently employed with Teach mint, an ed-tech start-up in their strategy team. Prior to Teach mint, he worked at Dalberg Advisors as an analyst where he worked with multi-laterals and international foundations on gender, education and energy sectors. He has also interned in MIT Sloan, Qualcomm and IIM Ahmedabad giving him a plethora of experience in the corporate and academic world. He also started his own venture in hyperlocal air-quality monitoring. Karan is an avid sport-person and masala chai fanatic
Meet The Authors (GGI Fellows)
Sam Chalyanth comes from a strong technology background, having graduated with a B.Tech degree from IIT Hyderabad. Over time, his passion has evolved from engineering solutions to shaping policies that drive impactful change. Currently working for the Indian government, Sam has had the unique opportunity to observe and understand administrative processes and public systems through a first-hand lens. This experience has deepened his desire to bridge the gap between technology and governance. With a long-term vision of working at the intersection of policy, innovation, and societal well-being, Sam aspires to fully transition into the policy space—contributing to evidence-based policymaking that responds to the emerging challenges of our times.
Through this paper, our team aims to highlight the urgent need for proactive, globally coordinated policy frameworks that can responsibly harness the disruptive potential of emerging technologies like AI and Quantum Computing. The broader goal is to contribute to evidence-based policymaking that ensures innovation serves humanity.
I am Shreya, after doing psychology from Ashoka University, I am currently pursuing law at the Punjab University, Chandigarh. I applied to GGI to bridge my understanding between what I learnt in college and the practicalities of how consulting can shape new - age businesses.
In this white paper, our group has put in all the learnings of GGI to lay down frameworks of AI and Quantum Computing.
This paper has personally helped me understand the future of Quantum Computing, through multidisciplinary studies of law and subsequent legal challenges that can come in the way of implementation, in a consulting style purview.
If you are interested in applying to GGI's Impact Fellowship program, you can access our application link here.
Citations
1.Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada. (n.d.). National Quantum Strategy – Roadmap for Quantum Computing. Government of Canada. https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/national-quantum-strategy/en/national-quantum-strategy-roadmap-quantum-computing
2. Department of Science & Technology, Government of India. (2023). National Quantum Mission (NQM). https://dst.gov.in/national-quantum-mission-nqm
3. Center for Strategic and International Studies. (2023). Quantum Technology: Applications and Implications. https://www.csis.org/analysis/quantum-technology-applications-and-implications
U.S. National Quantum Coordination Office. (n.d.). Quantum.gov. https://www.quantum.gov/
5. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. (2022). Quantum Computing and Cybersecurity. https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/quantum-computing-and-cybersecurity
6. U.S. Congress. (2022). Quantum Computing Cybersecurity Preparedness Act, H.R.7535, 117th Congress (2021–2022). https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/7535
7. Cutter Consortium. (2022). Shining a Light on AI’s Dark Side. https://www.cutter.com/article/shining-light-ai%E2%80%99s-dark-side
8. Jindal Global University. (2023). Published Article on AI and Policy. http://pure.jgu.edu.in/id/eprint/9125/1/Published%20Article.pdf
9. Statista. (2023). Global Concerns Over the Impact of AI 2023, by Country. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1473358/worldwide-concerns-impact-ai-by-country/
10. PwC. (2023). AI Predictions 2023: What's Next for Artificial Intelligence. https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/industries/technology/publications/ai-forecast.html
11. Boston Consulting Group. (2023). Quantum Computing: Business Applications and Implications. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2023/quantum-computing-business-applications
12. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (n.d.). AI Policy Initiatives Dashboard. https://oecd.ai/en/dashboards/policy-initiatives
13. UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137
14. NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography project https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/post-quantum-cryptography